PLAGIARISM DETECTION PROBLEMS AND ANALYSIS SOFTWARE TOOLS FOR ITS SOLVE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15802/stp2017/94034Keywords:
plagiarism, taxonomy of plagiarism, borrowing fragments, plagiarism detection systemAbstract
Purpose. This study is aimed at: 1) the definition of plagiarism in texts on formal and natural languages, building a taxonomy of plagiarism; 2) identify major problems of plagiarism detection when using automated tools to solve them; 3) Analysis and systematization of information obtained during the review, testing and analysis of existing detection systems. Methodology. To identify the requirements of the software to detect plagiarism apply methods of analysis of normative documentation (legislative base) and competitive tools. To check the requirements of the testing methods used and GUI interfaces review. Findings. The paper considers the concept of plagiarism issues of proliferation and classification. A review of existing systems to identify plagiarism: desktop applications, and online resources. Highlighting their functional characteristics, determine the format of the input and output data and constraints on them, customization features and access. Drill down system requirements is made. Originality. The authors proposed schemes complement the existing hierarchical taxonomy of plagiarism. Analysis of existing systems is done in terms of functionality and possibilities for use of large amounts of data. Practical value. The practical significance is determined by the breadth of the problem of plagiarism in various fields. In Ukraine, develops the legal framework for the fight against plagiarism, which requires the active solution development tasks, improvement and delivery of relevant software (PO). This work contributes to the solution of these problems. Review of existing programs, Anti-plagiarism, as well as study and research experience in the field and update the concept of plagiarism, the strategy allows it to identify more fully articulate to the functional performance requirements, the input and output of the developed software, as well as to identify the features of such software. The article focuses on the features of solving the problem of identification of borrowing in an academicenvironment.
References
ANTIPLAGIAT.VUZ. Rukovodstvo polzovatelya. Funktsionalnye vozmozhnosti rabochikh mest prepodavatelya, ministratora, menedzhera. (2011). Moscow: NGU. Retrieved from http://antiplagiat.nsu.ru/files/manual.pdf
eTxt Antiplagiat: Proverka unikalnosti tekstov. (n.d.) Retrieved from https://www.etxt.ru/antiplagiat/
Bolilyi, V. O., & Kopotii, V. V. (2011). Perevirka unikalnosti tekstu pry otsiniuvanni studentskykh robit tvorchoho abo doslidnytskoho kharakteru. Naukovi zapysky Naukovi zapysky Nizhynskoho derzhavnoho universytetu im. M. Hoholia. Seriia: Psykholoho-pedahohichni nauky, 7, 134-145.
Golunov, S. V. (2010). Plagiarism in students as challenge to higher education system in Russia and abroad. Educational Studies, 3, 243-257.
Luparenko, L. A. (2014). Plagiarism detection tools for research works: analysis of software solutions. Informatsiini tekhnolohii i zasoby navchannia, 40(2), 151-169.
Mikhaylovskiy, Y. B., & Dlugunovych, N. A. (2013). Anti-plagiarism system as a tool for plagiarism preventing in educational and research activities. Visnyk Khmelnytskoho natsionalnoho universytetu: Tekhnichni nauky, 3, 162-168.
TEXT.RU: Onlayn servis proverki teksta na unikalnost. (n.d.) Retrieved from http://text.ru/
Foreksis: Antiplagiat. (n.d.) Retrieved from http://www.forecsys.ru/ru/site/products/antiplagiat/
Pro avtorske pravo ta sumizhni prava: Zakon Ukrainy 1994, No 1651-19 (2016). Retrieved from http://zakon2.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/3792-12
Romanova, I. V. (2012). Yavyshche plahiatu: istoriia ta sohodennia. Foreign trade: economics, finance, law, 3(62), 267-272.
Tsyvilnyi kodeks Ukrainy 2003, No 1666-19 (2016). Retrieved from http://zakon0.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/435-15
Shostak, I. V., & Hruzdo, I. V. (2013). Kompiuteryzatsiia protsesu vyiavlennia plahiatu u studentskykh robotakh. Zbirnyk naukovykh prats Viiskovoho instytutu Kyivskoho natsionalnoho universytetu imeni Tarasa Shevchenka, 41, 99-109.
Shtefan, O. (2011). Plagiarism: the concept, attributes, responsibility. Teoriia i praktyka intelektualnoi vlasnosti, 6, 17-25.
Ali, Asim M. El Tahir, Abdulla, Hussam M. Dahwa, & Snasel, V. (2011, April 20). Overview and Comparison of Plagiarism Detection Tools. Proceedings of the Dateso 2011: Annual International Workshop on DAtabases, TExts, Specifications and Objects, Czech Republic, 161-172. Retrieved from http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-706/poster22.pdf
Bin-Habtoor, A. S., & Zaher, M. A. (2012). A Survey on Plagiarism Detection Systems. International Journal of Computer Theory and Engineering, 4(2), 185-188. doi: 10.7763/IJCTE.2012.V4.447
Copyscape. Compare Articles or Web Pages. (n.d.) Retrieved from http://www.copyscape.com/compare.php
Docol©c. (n.d.) Retrieved from http://docoloc.de/
Textbroker: Double Content Finder. (n.d.) Retrieved from https://textbroker.ru/main/dcfinder.html
Culwin, F., & Lancaster, T. (2000). A review of electronic services for plagiarism detection in student submissions. Proceedings of the First Annual Conference of the Learning and Teaching Support Network for Information and Computer Sciences. Retrieved from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.176.8211&rep=rep1&type=pdf
Jarrah, A. Al, Alsmad, I., & Za’atreh, Z. (2011). Plagiarism Detection based on studying correlation between Author, Title and Content. International Conference on Information Communication System (CICS), May 22-24, Irbid, Jordan.
Kakkonen, T., & Myller, N. (2009). AntiPlag – A Sampling-based Tool for Plagiarism Detection in Student Texts. Proceedings of the 8th European Conference on E-learning, October 29-30, Bari, Italy. 287-293.
Meuschke, N., & Gipp, B. (2013). State-of-the-art in detecting academic plagiarism. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 9(1), 50-71. doi: 10.21913/IJEI.v9i1.847
Mozgovoy, M., Kakkonen, T., & Cosma, G. (2010). Automatic Student Plagiarism Detection: Future Perspectives. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 43(4), 511-531. doi: 10.2190/ec.43.4.e
Mozgovoy, M. (2006). Desktop Tools for Offline Plagiarism Detection in Computer Programs. Informatics in Education, 5(1), 97-112.
OMG Unified Modeling Language (OMG UML), Infrastructure: Version 2.4.1 (2011).
Plagiarisma. (n.d.) Retrieved from http://plagiarisma.net/
Plagiarism-Checker.com. (n.d.) Retrieved from http://www.plagiarism-checker.com/
Plagium:Plagiarism checker & plagiarism detection. (n.d.) Retrieved from http://www.plagium.com/
Plagiarism Detector. (n.d.) Retrieved from http://plagiarismdetector.net/
PlagScan. (n.d.) Retrieved from http://www.plagscan.com/
Plagtracker. The most accurate plagiarism checking service. (n.d.) Retrieved from http://www.plagtracker.com/
Small SEO Tools: Plagiarism Checker. (n.d.) Retrieved from http://smallseotools.com/plagiarism-checker/
StrikePlagiarism.com. (n.d.) Retrieved from http://strikeplagiarism.com/ua/
Unplag.com. Plagiarism Detection Engine. (n.d.) Retrieved from https://ua.unplag.com/
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 V. I. Shynkarenko, О. S. Kuropiatnyk
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright and Licensing
This journal provides open access to all of its content.
As such, copyright for articles published in this journal is retained by the authors, under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). The CC BY license permits commercial and non-commercial reuse. Such access is associated with increased readership and increased citation of an author's work. For more information on this approach, see the Public Knowledge Project, the Directory of Open Access Journals, or the Budapest Open Access Initiative.
The CC BY 4.0 license allows users to copy, distribute and adapt the work in any way, provided that they properly point to the author. Therefore, the editorial board of the journal does not prevent from placing published materials in third-party repositories. In order to protect manuscripts from misappropriation by unscrupulous authors, reference should be made to the original version of the work.