INCOMPETENCE IN SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY - IT IS A BRAKE OF PROGRESS OR ABOUT RAIDING IN THE FIELD OF RESEARCH SERVICES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15802/stp2015/38234Keywords:
incompetence, raiding, research services, national security, improvement of legislationAbstract
Purpose. The analysis of the prerequisite appearing of the unfair competition in the market of research services to prevent raiding in science. Methodology. During the conducting of this study methods of scientific analysis and synthesis, the benchmarking method, the method of expert estimations were used. Findings. Possible methods of uncompetitive struggle during the performing of scientific research were examined. The urgency of this problem was proved. Therefore, the problem of the prerequisite appearing for incompetence on the market of research services and the task of its prevention and minimization of adverse effects for the development of science and technique is relevant, especially in the period of formation and the reform of the leading branches of the Ukrainian economy. The prerequisite appearing and conditions for the existence of incompetence in scientific activity were analyzed. The classification of the main ways of raiding was proposed and its justification was proved. Originality. The investigation of the phenomenon of unfair competition in the field of research services was pro-posed. The methods and means of competition between scientific organizations and individual scientists in some fields of knowledge were analyzed. The concept of "raiding" was introduced for the first time in the intellectual sphere. Practical value. The research results can be used to analyze the activity of scientific and engineering organizations, which carry out various studies to assess the validity and legitimacy of the obtained results, and to prevent raiding in science. The results of the study have practical value for public and private organizations in the determination of the competent performers to conduct research and development services, including expertise, and especially related to the evaluation of material losses or lost earnings when the impartiality and independence of this assessment is the guarantee of obtaining the reliable and objective results.
References
1. Andreyeva L.A. Reyderstvo: sostav prestupleniya [Raiding: component elements of a crime]. Available at: http://sibac.info/index.php/2009-07-01-10-21-16/970-2012-01-30-07-14-44 (Accessed 27 November 2014).
2. Babich T. Reiderstvo v Ukraini – zahroza natsionalnii bezpetsi [Raiding in Ukraine as a threat of national security]. Viche Publ., 2010, no. 14. Available at: http://www.viche.info/journal/2105/ (Accessed 27 November 2014).
3. Zerkalov D.V. Reyderstvo [Raiding]. Kiev, Osnova Publ., 2011. 372 p.
4. Karpilovskaya Ye., Klimenko N. Reydery v nauke [Raiders in science]. Den Publ., 2010, no. 167. Available at: http://www.day.kiev.ua/ru/article/obshchestvo/reydery-v-nauke (Accessed 25 November 2014).
5. Kryminalnyi kodeks Ukrainy [The criminal code of Ukraine]. Vidomosti Verkhovnoi Rady Ukrainy–Journal of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine, 2001, no. 25, 131 p.
6. Myamlin S.V. Progress transporta – zalog razvitiya natsionalnoy ekonomiki [The transport progress is an essential to the development of the national economy]. Nauka ta prohres transportu. Visnyk Dnipropetrovskoho natsionalnoho universytetu zaliznychnoho transport − Science and Transport Progress. Bulletin of Dnipropetrovsk National University of Railway Transport, 2013, no. 1 (43), pp. 7-12.
7. Nauka. Vikipediya [Science. Wikipedia]. Available at: https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/наука (Accessed 12 January 2015).
8. Nekompetentnost. Vikipediya [Incompetence. Wikipedia]. Available at: http://ru.wiktionary.org/wiki/некомпетентность. (Accessed 12 January 2015).
9. Pohoretskyi M., Shelomentsev V. Reiderstvo v Ukraini: problemy kryminalnoi vidpovidalnosti (Raiding in Ukraine: problems of criminal responsibility). Available at: http://xn--80ankme7e.com/84-rejderstvo-v-ukrayini-problemi-kriminalnoyi.html (Accessed 27 November 2014).
10. Repeshko P. Reyderstvo v sfere prava intellektualnoy sobstvennosti [Raiding in the sphere of intellectual property law]. Legea si viata, 2013, no. 11/4, pp. 162-166.
11. Prokhorova A.M. Sovetskiy entsiklopedicheskiy slovar [The Soviet encyclopedic dictionary]. Moscow, Sovetskaya entsiklopediya Publ., 1985. 1600 p.
12. Uaytkhed A.N. Izbrannyye raboty po filosofii [Selected works on philosophy]. Moscow, Progress Publ., 1990. 716 p.
13. Chelembii Yu. Nedoskonalist ukrainskoho zakonodavstva ye zhyvylnym gruntom dlia ukrainskykh reideriv [The imperfection of the Ukrainian legislation is a breeding ground for Ukrainian raiders]. Visnyk Ukrainskoi spilky promyslovtsiv ta pidpryiemtsiv [Bulletin of the Ukrainian Union of Industrialists and Entrepreneurs], 2007, no. 4, 24 p.
14. Atanassov J. Do Hostile Takeovers Stifle Innovation? Evidence from Antitakeover Legislation and Corporate Patenting. Journal of Finance, 2013, vol. 68, issue 3, pp. 1097-1131. doi: 10.1111/jofi.12019.
15. Cai W. Hostile takeovers and takeover defences in China. Hong Kong Law Journal, 2012, vol. 42, issue 3, pp. 901-938.
16. Jin Y. Study on cross-listed company's financial problems. Proc. of 2012 Intern. Conf. on Information Management, Innovation Management and Industrial Engineering. Sanya, China. 2012, pp. 349-352. – doi: 10.1109/iciii.2012.6339850
17. Osipian A. Predatory raiding in Russia: Institutions and property rights after the crisis. Journal of Economic Issues, 2012, no. 46 (2), pp. 469-479. – doi: 10.2753/jei0021-3624460222
18. Rochlitz M. Corporate raiding and the role of the state in Russia. Post-Soviet Affairs, 2014, no. 30, pp. 89-114. – doi: 10.1080/1060586x.2013.856573
19. Rojansky M. Corporate raiding in Ukraine: Causes, methods and consequences. Demokratizatsiya, 2014, no. 22 (3), pp. 411-443.
20. Servaes H., Tamayo A. How do industry peers respond to control threats? Management Science, 2014. no. 60 (2), pp. 380-399.
21. Yeh T.-M. The effects of anti-takeover measures on Japanese corporations. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 2014, no. 42 (4), pp. 757-780. – doi: 10.1007/s11156-013-0361-0
22. Zhang L. Hostile takeovers in China: Comparative corporate governance and institutional changes. International Journal of Private Law, 2013, no. 6 (4), pp. 341-354. – doi: 10.1504/ijpl.2013.056804
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright and Licensing
This journal provides open access to all of its content.
As such, copyright for articles published in this journal is retained by the authors, under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). The CC BY license permits commercial and non-commercial reuse. Such access is associated with increased readership and increased citation of an author's work. For more information on this approach, see the Public Knowledge Project, the Directory of Open Access Journals, or the Budapest Open Access Initiative.
The CC BY 4.0 license allows users to copy, distribute and adapt the work in any way, provided that they properly point to the author. Therefore, the editorial board of the journal does not prevent from placing published materials in third-party repositories. In order to protect manuscripts from misappropriation by unscrupulous authors, reference should be made to the original version of the work.
