Comprehensive Hazard Assessment of Railway–Road Level Crossings Considering the Cognitive Factor
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15802/stp2026/354458Keywords:
railway level crossing, traffic safety, diagnostics, cognitive hazard, cognitive dissonance, psychophysiological factorsAbstract
Purpose. The purpose of the study is to develop a diagnostic system for assessing the hazard level of railway level crossings based on a multifactor risk analysis within a structured set of criteria. To achieve this purpose, domestic and international regulatory documents governing the design and operation of at-grade railway–road crossings were reviewed, and their operational and economic characteristics were assessed. Methodology. The proposed methodology is aimed at increasing the level of detail and the informativeness of hazard assessment at the stage of practical application. Its diagnostic value lies in providing a basis for planning targeted, site-specific safety measures intended to eliminate particular hazard factors. It is shown that incorporating the cognitive factor enables more accurate ranking of level crossings and forms a rationale for substantiating targeted measures to improve traffic safety. Finding. The proposed comprehensive hazard assessment methodology, which incorporates the cognitive factor, was tested on a sample of railway level crossings. Based on aggregated tabular results, two crossings were classified as high-risk, one as elevated-risk, and one as moderate-risk, according to the assessment indicator structure (MSZ, KD, cognitive hazard coefficient, and integrated hazard index). Comparative analysis confirmed that inclusion of the cognitive factor significantly affects the integrated hazard index and enables identification of facilities with increased risk under moderate traffic dynamics, taking into account the influence of drivers’ cognitive dissonance and cognitive load. The high-risk class is associated with information-environment overload and contradictory signals as factors that contribute to hazardous situations. The results justify prioritizing measures such as improving signalling logic, unifying signal indications, increasing conspicuity, and reducing visual noise, and indicate that these measures can be implemented without substantial capital expenditure. Originality. For the first time, a multifactor methodology for assessing cognitive hazard at railway level crossings has been developed, based on integrating driver psychophysiological factors (cognitive load, cognitive dissonance, fatigue) into the overall risk calculation system. Unlike existing regulatory approaches, the proposed methodology makes it possible to diagnose specific causes of cognitive risk and to determine the priority of targeted measures aimed at reducing the probability of driver error. Practical value. In situations where the physical parameters of a railway level crossing (number of tracks, spatial layout, pavement type, presence and type of signalling) are technically or economically difficult to change, the methodology provides a tool for optimizing the information environment within the existing infrastructure. This makes it possible to address traffic-safety aspects that are not covered by current regulatory documents.
References
Bezpeka dorozhnoho rukhu. Znaky dorozhni. Zahalni tekhnichni umovy. Pravyla zastosuvannia, 144 DSTU 4100:2021. (2021). (in Ukrainian)
Bezpeka dorozhnoho rukhu. Rozmitka dorozhnia. Zahalni tekhnichni umovy, 102 DSTU 2587:2021. (2021). (in Ukrainian)
Budivli ta sporudy. Vyznachennia klasu naslidkiv (vidpovidalnosti), 17 DSTU 8855:2019. (2019). (in Ukrainian)
Kurhan, M. B., Luzhytskyi, O. F., Ivanov, R. V., Khmelevska, N. P., & Khmelevskyi, V. S. (2024). Implementation of Innovative Technologies During the Modernization of Existing Level Crossings for High-Speed Train Traffic. Science and Transport Progress, (1(105)), 62-83. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15802/stp2024/303191 (in Ukrainian)
Ministerstvo transportu ta zviazku Ukrainy. (2007). Pro zatverdzhennia Instruktsii z ulashtuvannia ta eksplu-atatsii zaliznychnykh pereizdiv. Retrieved from: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/z0162-07#Text (in Ukrainian)
Ministerstvo transportu Ukrainy. (2013). Pro zatverdzhennia Pravyl tekhnichnoi ekspluatatsii zaliznyts Ukrainy. Retrieved from: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/z0050-97#Text (in Ukrainian)
Kabinet Ministriv Ukrainy. (2013). Pro zatverdzhennia Tekhnichnoho rehlamentu bezpeky infrastruktury zaliznychnoho transportu. Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/494-2013-п#Text (in Ukrainian)
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2023/1695 of 10 August 2023. TSI CCS – Control, Command and Signalling. (2023). Official Journal of the European Union. Retrieved from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg_impl/2023/1695/oj (accessed: 15.02.2026). (in English)
European Union Agency for Railways. (2018). Human factors in railway safety. ERA Report. Valenciennes, France. (in English)
Fischer, S., Kurhan, M., & Kurhan, D. (2024). Innovative Technologies and Cognitive Factors for Enhancing Safety of Train and Car Movement at Level Crossings. Proceedings of the 3rd Cognitive Mobility Con-ference (COGMOB 2024), 1-13. Springer, Cham. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-81799-1_1 (in English)
Risk management. Guidelines, ISO 31000:2018. (2018). (in English)
Ergonomics of human-system interaction. Part 210: Human-centred design for interactive systems, ISO 9241-210:2019. (2019). (in English)
Kyriakidis, M., Pak, K. T., & Majumdar, A. (2015). Railway Accidents Caused by Human Error: Historic Analy-sis of UK Railways, 1945 to 2012. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Re-search Board, 2476(1), 98-107. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3141/2476-17 (in English)
International Transport Forum. (2024). Road Safety Annual Report 2024. Retrieved from https://www.itf-oecd.org/sites/default/files/docs/irtad-road-safety-annual-report-2024.pdf (in English)
Stanton, N. A., Salmon, P. M., Rafferty, L. A., Walker, G. H., Baber, C., & Jenkins, D. P. (2017). Human Factors Methods: A Practical Guide for Engineering and Design. Boca Raton: CRC Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315587394 (in English)
International Union of Railways. (2016). UIC Safety Level Crossing Index. Paris, France: UIC. (in English)
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Science and Transport Progress

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright and Licensing
This journal provides open access to all of its content.
As such, copyright for articles published in this journal is retained by the authors, under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). The CC BY license permits commercial and non-commercial reuse. Such access is associated with increased readership and increased citation of an author's work. For more information on this approach, see the Public Knowledge Project, the Directory of Open Access Journals, or the Budapest Open Access Initiative.
The CC BY 4.0 license allows users to copy, distribute and adapt the work in any way, provided that they properly point to the author. Therefore, the editorial board of the journal does not prevent from placing published materials in third-party repositories. In order to protect manuscripts from misappropriation by unscrupulous authors, reference should be made to the original version of the work.





