Methodology for Evaluating the Load-Carrying Capacity of Standardized Pontoon Bridge Structures
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15802/stp2026/353405Keywords:
floating (pontoon) bridges, critical length, assembly scheme, overcoming water obstacles, transport infrastructure functioning, Influence line method, variational modeling of floating systems, Finite Element Method (FEM)Abstract
Purpose. The objective of this study is to develop approaches for the objective investigation of the inventory structure of the NZhM–56 floating railway bridge. It involves selecting a computational model for the floating bridge to facilitate further substantiated research into load-carrying capacity and formulating recommendations for the deployment of NZhM–56 equipment to accommodate railway, vehicular, and tracked loads. Methodology. Variational modeling of NZhM–56 floating (pontoon) bridges using diverse configurations (varying in length and number of pontoon supports) for analysis via the influence line method. Analysis of the obtained results and substantiation of the bridge crossing computational model proposed for further research. Application of software implementing the Finite Element Method (FEM) to conduct the investigations. Findings. Development of approaches for recalculating the load-carrying capacity of inventory floating (pontoon) bridge systems using the finite element method. The study identifies the specific length and assembly configuration of the NZhM–56 floating bridge that exerts the greatest impact on internal forces generated under live loads. This configuration is selected for further research and for providing substantiated recommendations regarding live load passage. Furthermore, the most critical (unfavorable) scenarios and positions for live load placement have been proposed to investigate the stress-strain state of the structure. Originality. The scientific significance of this work lies in the selection of
a methodology for recalculating the load-carrying capacity of floating (pontoon) bridge systems, specifically focusing on the NZhM–56 bridge. A comprehensive investigation is conducted into the relationship between the critical length, the assembly configuration of the NZhM–56 bridge, and the magnitude of internal forces generated under live loads. Furthermore, the research focuses on the specific behavior of the transition section of the pontoon bridge, analyzed both as an independent subsystem and in its structural interaction with the river (main) span elements. Practical value. Definition of approaches and methodologies for recalculating the load-carrying capacity of inventory floating (pontoon) bridge systems, necessitated by contemporary challenges. The research is aimed at ensuring the safe passage of temporary railway, tracked, and wheeled loads over the NZhM–56 floating bridge. Furthermore, the study identifies specific features of investigating floating bridge systems through the application of software implementing the Finite Element Method (FEM).
References
Hernich, M. V., & Kliuchnyk, S. V. (2022). Use of property of floating bridge NZHM-56 considering today’s military challenges. Bridges and Tunnels: Theory, Research, Practice, 22, 27-32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15802/bttrp2022/268185 (in Ukrainian)
Ekspluatatsiia zaliznychnykh mostiv. Pravyla vyznachennia vantazhopidiomnosti metalevykh prohonovykh budov zaliznychnykh mostiv, 382 HSTU 32.6.03.111-2002. (2002). (in Ukrainian)
Sporudy transportu. Navantazhennia ta vplyvy. Mosty ta truby, 83 DBN V.1.2-15:2009. (2009). (in Ukrainian)
Zaliznytsi kolii 1520 mm. Normy proektuvannia, 127 DBN V.2.3-19:2025. (2025). (in Ukrainian)
Metodychni rekomendatsii z vyznachennia vantazhopidiomnosti avtodorozhnikh mostiv, 48 MR V.2.3-37641918-921:2021. (2021). (in Ukrainian)
Metodychni rekomendatsii shchodo proiektuvannia ta vlashtuvannia tymchasovykh avtomobilnykh dorih i mostiv, 58 MR V.2.3-37641918-940:2024. (2025). (in Ukrainian)
Perepelytsia, K. M., & Kliuchnyk, S. V. (2025). Research of Pontoon Bridge Elements in View of Modern Challenges in Terms of Load Capacity. Science and Transport Progress, 2(110), 154-164. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15802/stp2025/332774 (in Ukrainian).
Telov, V. Y., Koblov, Y. T., Tarakanov, Y. N., & Novykov, H. Y. (1977). Naplavnoi zheleznodorozhnыi most NZhM–56. Moscow, Russia: Voenyzdat (in Russian)
Instruktsiia z vyznachennia umov propusku rukhomoho skladu po metalevykh ta zalizobetonnykh mostakh, 301 TsP-0093. (2002). (in Ukrainian)
Chmielewski, R., Piechota, M., & Bawiec, B. (2020). Emergency use of a floating bridge within a large urban conurbation. Engineering Expert, 1, 24-34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37105/enex.2020.1.1.04 (in English)
Military load classification of bridges, ferries, rafts and vehicles (STANAG 2021 Ed. 8 / AEP-3.12.1.5). (2017). Brussels: NATO Standardization Office (in English)
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Science and Transport Progress

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright and Licensing
This journal provides open access to all of its content.
As such, copyright for articles published in this journal is retained by the authors, under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). The CC BY license permits commercial and non-commercial reuse. Such access is associated with increased readership and increased citation of an author's work. For more information on this approach, see the Public Knowledge Project, the Directory of Open Access Journals, or the Budapest Open Access Initiative.
The CC BY 4.0 license allows users to copy, distribute and adapt the work in any way, provided that they properly point to the author. Therefore, the editorial board of the journal does not prevent from placing published materials in third-party repositories. In order to protect manuscripts from misappropriation by unscrupulous authors, reference should be made to the original version of the work.





