Modernization of Existing Level Crossings in the Areas of Construction of the European Standard Railway Track in Ukraine

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15802/stp2024/316608

Keywords:

road safety, combined track, modernization, interoperability, railway crossing

Abstract

Purpose. The article aims to analyze modern technological solutions to improve the level of safety at railway crossings, prevent emergencies and ensure uninterrupted traffic. Methodology. The study is based on the use of mathematical modeling and numerical methods to analyze the impact of modernization and new projects on the level of safety at railway crossings. Using computer modeling, mathematical models were built that reflect different scenarios of crossings. Based on the data obtained, the effectiveness of the proposed measures was assessed and recommendations for further optimization of the security system were developed. To evaluate the effectiveness of the proposed measures, a system of indicators has been developed to quantify the level of safety of railway crossings before and after modernization. These indicators take into account the daily intensity of train traffic through the crossing, the daily intensity of traffic on the road, the equipment of the crossing, the radius of the curve in the plan and the longitudinal slope of the road on the approaches to the crossing. Findings. An improvement of the method of the final accident rate, which is one of the most common tools for assessing traffic safety at railroad crossings, is proposed. The application of this method made it possible to quantify the level of risk of accidents and analyze the effectiveness of measures aimed at improving safety. The method is relatively easy to use and does not require complex mathematical calculations, and allows taking into account a wide range of factors affecting traffic safety at a level crossing, such as traffic volume, design features of the level crossing, availability of signaling, etc. The final coefficient was used to compare the safety level of different crossings and track the dynamics of changes in their equipment over time. This made it possible to identify crossings that require priority modernization, as well as to predict changes in the initial and calculated data and plan measures to introduce innovative technologies that improve traffic safety at crossings. Originality. An integrated model for assessing the safety of railroad crossings has been developed that takes into account not only traditional indicators (frequency of accidents, traffic intensity) but also new factors such as equipment reliability, human factor, and the impact of external conditions. The proposed model makes it possible to determine a more accurate risk forecast and choose optimal solutions for the modernization of level crossings, taking into account specific operating conditions. Practical value. The formulated recommendations can be used to develop effective programs for the modernization of railway crossings in Ukraine. The implementation of the proposed technologies will increase the level of traffic safety by 20% and reduce the average waiting time at a crossing by 15%. In addition, it will help to increase railroad capacity and reduce infrastructure maintenance costs.

References

Vodiany, A. (2023). EU developed a strategy for Ukraine's transition to European gauge 1435 mm. LIGA.net. Retrieved from https://biz.liga.net/ua/all/transport/novosti/evrosoyuz-razrabotal-strategiyu-perehoda-ukrainy-na-evroputi-karta (in Ukrainian)

Kurhan, M. B., Luzhytskyi, O. F., Ivanov, R. V., & Khmelevskyi, V. S. (2024). Implementation of Innovative Technologies During the Modernization of Existing Level Crossings for High-Speed Train Traffic. Science and Transport Progress, 1(105), 62-83. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15802/stp2024/303191 (in Ukrainian)

Kurhan, M. B., Kurhan, D. M., Husak, M. A., Havrylov, M. O., & Luzhytskyi, O. F. (2022). Vehicle Traffic Safe-ty Assessment at the Intersection of Highways and Railways at the Same Level. Science and Transport Progress, 2(98), 45-58. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15802/stp2022/267978 (in Ukrainian)

Metodyka otsinky rivniv bezpeky rukhu na avtomobilnykh dorohakh Ukrainy, M 218-03450778-652:2008 (2008). Kyiv: State Road Service of Ukraine (Ukravtodor). (in Ukrainian)

Instruktsiia z ulashtuvannia ta ekspluatatsii zaliznychnykh pereizdiv, TsP-0174. (2007). Kyiv: Ministry of Jus-tice of Ukraine. (in Ukrainian)

Assessment of safety at level crossings in UNECE member countries and other selected countries and strategic framework for improving safety at level crossings. Working Party on Rail Transport. Retrieved from https://unece.org/DAM/trans/doc/2016/sc2/ECE-TRANS-SC2-2016-id05e.pdf (in English)

Blagojević, A., Kasalica, S., Stević, Ž., Tričković, G., & Pavelkić, V. (2021). Evaluation of Safety Degree at Railway Crossings in Order to Achieve Sustainable Traffic Management: A Novel Integrated Fuzzy MCDM Model. Sustainability, 13(2), 832-852. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su13020832 (in English)

Dezhkam, B., & Eslami, S. M. (2017). A review of methods for highway-railway crossings safety management process. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 12(3), 561-568. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/632 (in English)

Ishak, S. Z., Yue, W. L., & Somenahalli, S. (2011). An assessment of heavy vehicle safety at level crossing using Petri nets: South Australia case studies. Journal of the Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies, 9, 1823-1838. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11175/easts.9.1823 (in English)

Level Crossing Risk Assessment Guidance. KiwiRail. Retrieved from https://www.kiwirail.co.nz/assets/Uploads/documents/Level-Crossing-Risk-Assessment-Guidance.pdf (in English)

Otto, A., Kellermann, P., Thieken, A. H., Máñez Costa, M., Carmona, M., & Bubeck, P. (2019). Risk reduction partnerships in railway transport infrastructure in an alpine environment. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 33, 385-397. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.10.025 (in English)

Principles for managing level crossing safety. Office of Rail and Road. Retrieved from https://www.orr.gov.uk/sites/default/files/2021-06/principles-for-managing-level-crossing-safety-june-2021_0.pdf (in English)

Read, G. J. M., Cox, J. A., Hulme, A., Naweed, A., & Salmon, P. M. (2021). What factors influence risk at rail level crossings? A systematic review and synthesis of findings using systems thinking. Safety Science, 138, 1-13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2021.105207 (in English)

Sekasi, J., & Solihu, H. (2021). Safety and risk analysis at railway crossings of north-south Addis Ababa light rail. Smart and Resilient Transportation, 3(3), 266-282. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/srt-08-2021-0007

Summary of the work of the Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific, 2018-2019. UN. ESCAP. Retrieved from https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/3807384?ln=en&v=pdf (in English)

The Australian Level Crossing Assessment Model. ALCAM in Detail. An Introduction to the new ALCAM models (2014). Retrieved from https://www.alcam.com.au/media/drtl4t1f/alcam-in-detail-update-2016.pdf (in English)

Turner, S., Cook, E., & Bosher, S. (2021). Level Crossing Safety Impact Assessments for Vehicle and Pedestrian Crossings. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2675(9), 1482-1492. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/03611981211007857 (in English)

Published

2024-12-20

How to Cite

Kurhan, M. B., Kurhan, A. M., Luzhytskyi, O. F., Ivanov, R. V., & Khmelevska, N. (2024). Modernization of Existing Level Crossings in the Areas of Construction of the European Standard Railway Track in Ukraine. Science and Transport Progress, (4(108), 31–45. https://doi.org/10.15802/stp2024/316608

Issue

Section

RAILROAD AND ROADWAY NETWORK