Vehicle Traffic Safety Assessment at the Intersection of Highways and Railways at the Same Level
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15802/stp2022/267978Keywords:
level crossing, traffic safety, traffic accident, AIS Pereizd automated information subsystem, the method of the final accident rateAbstract
Purpose. The purpose of the study is to assess the state of vehicle traffic safety at the intersection of highways and railways at the same level, as well as the subsequent development of measures to improve road traffic safety at railroad crossings. Assessing the degree of road traffic safety at railway crossings is one of the main tasks of both the road operation service and railway transport services. Therefore, it is advisable to implement a system for assessing the level of safety at railroad crossings, which is necessary to identify dangerous areas and develop measures to improve traffic conditions on them. Methodology. In order to obtain initial data and methods of assessing the state of vehicle traffic safety at the intersection of highways and railways at the same level, the authors conducted a review of the world literature on the topic of the study, as well as monitoring the safety of vehicle traffic at the intersection of highways with railway tracks. On the basis of the various methodological approaches analysis, the method of the final accident rate was used, which makes it possible to assess the state of safety as a result of the modernization or new design decisions, that is, in the absence of data on road accidents. Findings. It was found that according to the final coefficient of railway accident rate, crossings can be classified into one of four classes: safe, low-risk, dangerous, very dangerous. The issue of reducing the risk of an accident at the interaction of railway and road transport has been studied. Originality. Scientific approaches to evaluating the safety of vehicle movement at the intersection of highways and railways have gained further development, at the same level as the calculation of accident coefficients and danger indicators based on the data of the AIS Pereizd subsystem, which is being implemented on the railways of Ukraine. Practical value. The obtained results will be useful for carrying out measures to increase the safety of traffic through railway crossings, especially in the directions of the introduction of high-speed train traffic. The use of the AIS Pereizd automated information subsystem will allow using the method of the final accident rate and evaluating the safety of rail transport and motor vehicles in the area of railway crossings without additional labor costs.
References
Abramova, L. S. Shirin, V. V., & Ptitsa, G. G. (2015). Analysis of methods for determining road safety indicators. Bulletin of KhNADU, 69, 118-123. (in Russian)
Intehrovanyi zvit AT «Ukrzaliznytsia» / Departament staloho rozvytku ta vnutrishnikh komunikatsii. (2020). Кyiv. (in Ukraine)
Kurhan, M. B., Luzhitskij, O. F., & Gavrilov, M. O. (2014). Ways to reduce accidents at railway crossings. Electromagnetic compatibility and safety in railway transport, 7, 53-62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15802/ecsrt2014/51379 (in Ukraine)
Luzhytskyi, O. F. (2016). Zabezpechennja bezpeky rukhu na zaliznychnykh perejizdakh. Ukrajinsjka zaliznycja, 7(37), 52-56. (in Ukrainian)
Kurgan, M. B., Kurgan, D. M., & Luzhytskyi, O. F. (2015). Inequalities research of the track at the railroad crossings. Science and Transport Progress, 5(59), 84-96. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15802/stp2015/55341 (in Ukraine)
Metodyka otsinky rivniv bezpeky rukhu na avtomobilnykh dorohakh Ukrainy: M 218-03450778-652:2008. (2008). Кyiv, DerzhdorNDI. (in Ukraine)
Vyshnevska, O. A. (Ed.). (2021). Ukraina u tsyfrakh u 2021 rotsi. Statistical collection. State Statistics Service. Kyiv. (in Ukraine)
Assessment of safety at level crossings in UNECE member countries and other selected countries and strategic framework for improving safety at level crossings. (2016). Informal document SC.2, 5, 1-50. (in English)
Blagojević, A., Kasalica, S., Tričković, G., & Pavelkić, V. (2021). Evaluation of Safety Degree at Railway Crossings in Order to Achieve Sustainable Traffic Management: A Novel Integrated Fuzzy MCDM Model. Sustainability, 13(2), 1-20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su13020832 (in English)
Bureika, G., Komaisko, M., & Jastremskas, V. (2017). Modelling the ranking of Lithuanian railways level crossing by safety evel. Transport problems, 12, 11-22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20858/tp.2017.12.se.1 (in English)
Dezhkam, B., & Eslami, M. (2017). A review of methods for highway-railway crossings safety management process. International electronic journal of mathematics education, 12(3), 561-568. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/632 (in English)
Djordjević, B., Krmac, E., & Mlinarić, T. J. (2018). Non-radial DEA model: A new approach to evaluation of safety at railway level crossings. Safety Science, 103, 234-246. DOI: https://10.1016/j.ssci.2017.12.001 (in English)
ERAIL. (n. d.). Safety Indicators. European Railway Agency. Retrieved from http://erail.era.europa.eu European Railway Agency. (n. d.). European Railway Agency. Retrieved from http://www.era.europa.eu (in English)
Federal Railroad Administration. (n. d.). United States Department of Transportation. Retrieved from http://www.fra.dot.gov (in English)
Final Report Rail inquiry RO-2019-108. (n. d.). Transport Accident Investigation Commission. Retrieved from https://www.taic.org.nz/inquiry/ro-2019-108 (in English)
Gill, A., & Smoczyński, P. (2018). Layered model for convenient designing of safety system upgrades in railways. Safety Science, 110, 168-176. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2017.11.024 (in English)
Havryliuk, V. I., Voznyak, O. M., & Meleshko, V. V. (2016). Improving the positioning accuracy of train on the approach section to the railway crossing. Science and Transport Progress, 1(61), 9-18. DOI: https://10.15802/stp2016/60936 (in English)
Krmac, E., & Djordjević, B. (2018). Evaluation of the levels of safety at railway level crossings using data envelopment analysis (DEA) method: A case study on Slovenian railways. European Transport-Trasporti Europei, 67, 1-9. (in English)
Knution, M. (2004). Reducing the risk of accidents at level crossings. Railways of the world, 9, 62-64. (in English)
Level Crossing Risk Assessment Guidance. (2021). KiwiRail, 4, 1-78. Retrieved from https://www.kiwirail.co.nz/assets/Uploads/documents/Level-Crossing-Risk-Assessment-Guide-2021.pdf (in English)
Nkunzimana, L., Minja, G., Wilfred, C. M., & Didai, M. (2021). Automatic Railway Road Crossing (RLC) Traffic Light System for Metric Gauge Railway Network in Tanzania. International Journal of Scientific Research in Computer Science Engineering and Information Technology, 7(11), 1-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31695/ijasre.2021.34099 (in English)
Federal Railroad Administration. (n. d.). Retrieved from http://safetydata.fra.dot.gov/officeofsafety/ (in English)
Principles for managing level crossing safety. (2021). Office of Rail and Road, 1-31. Retrieved from https://www.orr.gov.uk/sites/default/files/2021-06/principles-for-managing-level-crossing-safety-june-2021_0.pdf (in English)
Read, G. J. M., Cox, J. A., Hulme, A., Naweed, A., & Salmon, P. M. (2021). What factors influence risk at rail level crossings? A systematic review and synthesis of findings using systems thinking. Safety Science, 138, 1-13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2021.105207 (in English)
Sekasi, J., & Solihu, H. (2021). Safety and risk analysis at railway crossings of north-south Addis Ababa light rail. Smart and Resilient Transportation, 3(3), 266-282. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/SRT-08-2021-0007 (in English)
Summary of the work of the Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific, 2018–2019. (2019). Economic and Social Council, 1-19. (in English)
The Australian Level Crossing Assessment. Model ALCAM in Detail. (2016). An Introduction to the new ALCAM models (2014), 1-31. Retrieved from https://alcam.com.au/media/1013/alcam-in-detail-update-august-2016.pdf (in English)
Turner, S., Cook, E., & Bosher, S. (2021). Level Crossing Safety Impact Assessments for Vehicle and Pedestrian Crossings. Transportation Research Record, 2675(9), 1482-1492. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/03611981211007857 (in English)
Yang, X., Li, J. Q., Wang, K. C. P., Hatt, J., & Schwennesen, J. (2022). Selection of at-grade highway-rail crossings for grade separation. International Journal of Rail Transportation, 1-21. DOI: https://10.1080/23248378.2022.2060359 (in English)
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Science and Transport Progress
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright and Licensing
This journal provides open access to all of its content.
As such, copyright for articles published in this journal is retained by the authors, under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). The CC BY license permits commercial and non-commercial reuse. Such access is associated with increased readership and increased citation of an author's work. For more information on this approach, see the Public Knowledge Project, the Directory of Open Access Journals, or the Budapest Open Access Initiative.
The CC BY 4.0 license allows users to copy, distribute and adapt the work in any way, provided that they properly point to the author. Therefore, the editorial board of the journal does not prevent from placing published materials in third-party repositories. In order to protect manuscripts from misappropriation by unscrupulous authors, reference should be made to the original version of the work.