РОЗРОБКА АЛГОРИТМУ ВИБОРУ РАЦІОНАЛЬНОЇ ФАСАДНОЇ СИСТЕМИ БАГАТОПОВЕРХОВИХ БУДІВЕЛЬ

A. V.  Radkevych; T. V.  Tkach; K. M.  Netesa

doi:10.15802/stp2020/225268

Authors

A. V. Radkevych Dnipro National University of Railway Transport named after Academician V. Lazaryan, Ukraine https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6325-8517
T. V. Tkach Prydniprovska State Academy of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Ukraine https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9433-7514
K. M. Netesa Dnipro National University of Railway Transport named after Academician V. Lazaryan, Ukraine https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4087-5552

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15802/stp2020/225268

Keywords:

facade system, parameters of influence, construction participants

Abstract

Purpose. The authors aimed to form an algorithm for choosing a rational facade system for a specific construction site, taking into account climatic, organizational-technological and operational properties, applicable to use by any participant in the construction process. Methodology. The criteria for choosing a rational facade system were determined. The state of choosing and applicability of modern facade systems for new construction and overhaul in Ukraine was analyzed. Based on certain factors influencing the choice of the most rational facade system of a multi-storey residential or public building the authors formed a convenient and objective algorithm for choosing a facade system, taking into account the main features of the construction object, as well as operating parameters. The algorithm was adapted to practical application. Findings. The influence of the parameters of choosing facade system on the process of arrangement, operation and repair of the modern facade system is established. The obtained algorithm for choosing a rational facade system by an estimation of values of influence factors in activity of the leading design organizations of Dnipro was successfully tested. By passing the appropriate algorithms at the joint meetings of the designer, customer and contractor, the most rational facade systems were found for specific construction projects with significant objectivity of choice. The adaptability of the algorithm by discarding minor factors leads to increased visibility of the process of choosing a facade system. Originality. The regularity of the influence of a number of organizational-technological and operational factors on the process of choosing a rational facade system is established. The efficiency of determining the appropriate system for specific construction conditions has been increased, taking into account the peculiarities of operation and purpose of the building. Practical value. The participant of construction by passing a simple algorithm has the opportunity to clearly assess the influence of organizational, technological and operational factors on the choice of a rational facade system. By evaluating the parameters of the corresponding factors, the most rational facade system for a particular object was determined. As a result, the cost of operation of the facade system is significantly reduced while optimizing the duration of repair periods and improving the working conditions of the components of the facade system.

References

Gagarin, V. G. (2007). Teploizolyatsionnye fasady s tonkim shtukaturnym sloem. Ventilation, Heating, Air Condi-tioning, Heat Supply and Building Thermal Physics, 6, 82-90. (in Russian)

Galushko, V., & Rolitienko, Y. (2016). The use of cold bonding as an alternative to mechanical fastening method of roofing materials. Bridges and tunnels: Theory, Research, Practice, 9, 4-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15802/bttrp2016/103384 (in Russian)

Nastanova osnovy proektuvannia konstruktsiim, 81 DSTU-N B V.1.2-13:2008 (2009). (in Ukrainian)

Emelianova, V. A., Nemova, N. D., & Miftakhova, D. R. (2014). Optimized structure of ventilated facades. Maga-zine of Civil Engineering, 6(50), 53-66. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5862/mce.50.6 (in Russian)

Yenotkina, S. A. (2011). Ekspluatatsiya mnogosloynykh ograzhdayushchikh konstruktsiy. Young Scientist, 6((29)1), 49-52. (in Russian)

Radkevich, A. V., Arutyunyan, I. A., & Dankevich, N. O. (2017). Analysis of existing methods and models when rationale of organizational-technological solutions of construction objects. Bridges and tunnels: Theory, Research, Practice, 11, 74-80. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15802/bttrp2017/158794 (in Ukraninan)

Radkevich, A. V., & Netesa, K. N. Problematika sovremennykh fasadnykh sistem mnogoetazhnykh zhilykh zdaniy. Bulletin of Odessa state academy of civil engineering and architecture, 61, 358-364. (in Russian)

Savyovskiy, V. V. (2011). Bezopasnost i nadezhnost ekspluatatsii sovremennykh zdaniy. Bulletin of Prydniprovs’ka State Academy of Civil Engineering and Architecture, 11-12, 50-54. (in Russian)

Savyovskiy, V. V., Dzhalalov, M. N., Savyovskiy, A. V., & Mulyar, A. N. (2010). Energoaudit i termomodernizatsi-ya zdaniy. Budivnytstvo Ukrainy, 6, 3-7. (in Russian)

Tusnina, O. A., Emelianov, A. A., & Tusnina, V. M. (2013). Thermal insulation properties of various ventilated fa-cade systems. Magazine of Civil Engineering, 8(43), 54-63. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5862/mce.43.8 (in Russian)

Block, P., Schlueter, A., Veenendaal, D., Bakker, J., Begle, M., Hischier, I., … Lydon, G. P. (2017). NEST HiLo: Investigating lightweight construction and adaptive energy systems. Journal of Building Engineering, 12, 332-341. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2017.06.013 (in English)

Ciampi, M., Leccese, F., & Tuoni, G. (2002). Some thermalparameters inﬂuence on the energy performance of theventilated walls. In Proceedings of 20th UIT National HeatTransfer Conference (pp. 357-362), Maratea, Italy. (in Italian)

Falagan, D. H. (2017). Towards a pragmatic architecture. The case of Tous & Fargas. Research Journal, 4(2), 119-147. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4995/vlc.2017.6952 (in English)

Figaszewski, J., & Sokołowska-Moskwiak, J. (2017). The concept of multifuncional wall - an energy system inte-grated in a single wall. Architecture, Civil Engineering, Environment, 10(1), 5-10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21307/acee-2017-001 (in English)

Gallo, P., & Romano, R. (2017). Adaptive Facades, Developed with Innovative Nanomaterials, for a Sustainable Architecture in the Mediterranean Area. Procedia Engineering, 180, 1274-1283. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.04.289 (in English)

Park, S., Neizert, T., Kim, Y., & Lee, S. (2017). Properties of Lightweight Composites Using Industry Wastes with NaOH Alkaline Activator. Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering, 16(3), 619-624. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3130/jaabe.16.619 (in English)

Pittau, F., Malighetti, L. E., Iannaccone, G., & Masera, G. (2017). Prefabrication as Large-scale Efficient Strategy for the Energy Retrofit of the Housing Stock: An Italian Case Study. Procedia Engineering, 180, 1160-1169. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.04.276 (in English)

Radkevych, A. V., & Netesa, K. M. (2015). Aspects definition of reliability evaluation facade systems from the view point of eurocode. Science and Transport Progress, 4(58), 205-212. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15802/stp2015/49287 (in English)