Contradiction between technocratic and humanistic systems of values
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15802/stp2013/19764Keywords:
humanistic system of values, technocratic system of values, education, information, culture, intellect, personal, social, individuality, societyAbstract
Purpose. The purpose of the paper is determination of difference between technocratic and humanistic value systems. The authors also suggest to outline the range of issues specific to modern technological civilization, reflect its controdictory nature, as well as to focus on the university activity fields concerning formation and/or restoration of technocratic and humanitarian balance. Methodology. The most important methodological principle of the work is a systematic approach. It has determined logic of description and conclusion. During the study authors analyzed separate aspects of social development of the late 20th – early 21st centuries, as well as content analysis of the global information flow (documentary and non-documentary) on this topic and their own observations, obtained during the implementation of long-term educational and scientific practices at the university. It is, for example, drawing up a comparative table of technocratic and humanistic value systems. The authors have conducted a comparative analysis of 2 Sociological Research data (2009 and 2013 years) among university youth of Dnipropetrovsk "Modern Library by Students′ Eyes" and trending concerning the issues about the role of reading in the students lives. Findings. The difference between the technocratic and humanistic value systems was determined. Contemporary problems of the personal intellectual development in the process of education and training in technical universities during the dominance of technocratic value systems were outlined. Attention is focused on the university directions on formation and / or restoration of technocratic and humanitarian balance. Originality. The authors have analyzed and outlined a range of issues specific to contemporary industrial civilization, its controversial nature was reflected. Rebalancing of the technocratic and humanitarian is one of the major tasks in our time. The directions of universities activities were determined. Practical value. Highlighting the several problems solving necessity will ensure harmony in the interaction of technocratic and humanistic value systems. The material presented in this article can be used in the teaching of Humanities and Social Sciences, in the activities of various cultural and informational, mass-cultural, social structures of the University; the activity directions of which suggest a sociocultural understanding of technology, its achievements, the consequences of its development, the responsibility for its use, contributing to the restoration of harmony in the development of human and technological spheres.
References
Averyanov A.M. Sistemnoye poznaniye mira [Systematic learning the world]. Moscow, Politizdat Publ., 1985. 263 p.
Bekhterev V.M. Izbrannyye raboty po sotsialnoy psikhologii [Selected works on social psychology]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1994. 400 p.
Vernadskiy V.I. Filosofskiye mysli naturalista [Philosophical thoughts of naturalist]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1988. 520 p.
Viner N. Kibernetika i obshchestvo [Cybernetics and Society]. Moscow, IL Publ., 1958. 200 p.
Gvishiani D.M. Izbrannyye trudy po filosofii, sotsiologii i sistemnomu analizu[Selected works on philosophy, sociology and systems analysis]. Moscow, Izd-vo Kanon, OI «Reabilitatsiya» Publ., 2007. 672 p.
Kazakevich M.I. Nachala teorii sistem i sistemnogo analiza [Basis of systems theory and systems analysis]. Dnipropetrovsk, TOV «Aktsent PP» Publ., 2013. 179 p.
Kolesnikova T.A. Biblioteka vysshey shkoly i novaya forma informatsionnogo vzaimodeystviya [Library of Higher School and a new form of information interaction]. Materialy mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii «Biblioteka vysshey shkoly na novom etape razvitiya sotsialnykh kommunikatsiy» [Proc. of Int. Sci. and Practical Conf. «Library of higher school at a new stage of social communications development»]. Dnipropetrovsk, 2013, pp. 64-70. Available at: http://eadnurt.diit.edu.ua:82/jspui/handle/123456789/1776. (Accessed 02 December 2013).
Kolesnykova T. Suchasna biblioteka VNZ ochyma studentiv: za rezultatamy sotsiolohichnoho doslidzhennia [The modern university library with the eyes of students: a sociological research]. Visnyk Knyzhkovoi palaty − Book Chamber Bulletin, 2009, no. 7. pp. 26-30. Available at: http://eadnurt.diit.edu.ua:82/jspui/bitstream/123456789/435/1/. (Accessed 02 December 2013).
Moiseyev N.N. Chelovek i Noosfera [Man and Noosphere]. Moscow, Molodaya gvardiya Publ., 1990. 351 p.
Petrenko O.A. Korystuvach ta biblioteka: analiz anketuvannia v DNUZT [User and Library: in the analysis of DNUZT questionnaire]. Materialy mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii «Biblioteka vysshey shkoly na novom etape razvitiya sotsialnykh kommunikatsiy» [Proc. of Int. Sci. and Practical Conf. «Library of higher school at a new stage of social communications development»]. Dnipropetrovsk, 2013, pp. 158-168. Available at: http://eadnurt.diit.edu.ua:82/jspui/handle/123456789/1796. (Accessed 02 December 2013).
Prigozhin I., Stengers I.Poryadok iz khaosa. Novyy dialog cheloveka s prirodoy [Order out of chaos. New dialogue of a man with nature]. Moscow, Editorial URSS Publ., 2000. 312 p.
Pentl R. Metody sistemnogo analiza okruzhayushchey sredy [Methods of environment system analysis]. Moscow, Mir Publ., 1979. 214 p.
Sadovskiy V.N. Osnovaniya obshchey teorii sistem: logiko-metodologicheskiy analiz [Grounds of general systems theory: the logical and methodological analysis]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1974. 280 p.
Sokolova Ye.V. Virtualnoye prostranstvo: novyye fenomeny kommunikatsii (Virtual space: new communication phenomena). Antropolohichni vymiry filosofskykh doslidzhen – Anthropological measurements of philosophical research, 2012, issue 1, pp. 41-47. Available at: http://ampr.diit.edu.ua/article/view/7816. (Accessed 02 December 2013).
Chizhevskiy A.A. Zemlya v obyatiyakh Solntsa [Earth in the arms of the Sun]. Moscow, Eksmo Publ., 2004. 928 p.
Yudin E.G. Sistemnyy podkhod i printsip deyatelnosti. Metodologicheskiye problemy sovremennoy nauki [System approach and the principle of activity. Methodological problems of modern science]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1978. 391 p.
Yurikova S.A. Perspektivy chelovechestva v usloviyakh tekhnogennoy tsivilizatsii (Prospects of mankind in conditions of technological civilization). Antropolohichni vymiry filosofskykh doslidzhen – Anthropological measurements of philosophical research, 2013, issue 3, pp. 94-101. Available at: http://ampr.diit.edu.ua/article/view/14554. (Accessed 02 December 2013).
Bämayr А. Das Mobbingsyndrom: Diagnostik, Therapie und Begutachtung. Hamburg, Europäischer Universitätsverlag Publ., 2012. 278 р.
Donne J. No Man Is An Island. Poems by John Donne. Available at: http://www.poemhunter.com/poem/no-man-is-an-island/. (Accessed 02 December 2013).
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 M. I. Kazakevich, I. I. Guzova
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright and Licensing
This journal provides open access to all of its content.
As such, copyright for articles published in this journal is retained by the authors, under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). The CC BY license permits commercial and non-commercial reuse. Such access is associated with increased readership and increased citation of an author's work. For more information on this approach, see the Public Knowledge Project, the Directory of Open Access Journals, or the Budapest Open Access Initiative.
The CC BY 4.0 license allows users to copy, distribute and adapt the work in any way, provided that they properly point to the author. Therefore, the editorial board of the journal does not prevent from placing published materials in third-party repositories. In order to protect manuscripts from misappropriation by unscrupulous authors, reference should be made to the original version of the work.