DETERMINATION OF CHARACTERISTICS OF THROTTLING DEVICE FOR PNEUMATIC SPRING

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15802/stp2018/123394

Keywords:

spring suspension, pneumatic spring, pressure drop

Abstract

Purpose. This paper focuses on determination of the dependence of the working medium flow on the capacity of the throttling device, its geometric features and the pressure difference in the pneumatic spring cylinder and in the auxiliary reservoir. Methodology. Calculation of the dependence of the working medium and pressure drop is performed in two ways: 1) by numerical simulation of a stationary gas flow through a throttling element; 2) its analytical calculation expression using empirical relationships (control calculation to evaluate the reliability of numerical simulation results). For the calculation, three models of throttling devices were chosen. Dependence of the flow rate of the working medium on the capacity of the throttling device and its geometric features was determined based on the approximation of the dependency graphs of the pressure drop against the mass flow rate of the working medium. Findings. We obtained graphical dependencies between the pressure drop and the mass flow rate of the working medium from the two calculation options. Based on the results of calculations performed with the help of a software package with visualization of the results, we calculated a proportionality coefficient that describes the dependence of the working medium flow on the throttling device capacity and its geometric features for each of the throttling elements considered, with three degrees of closure. The air flow values, obtained by numerical simulation, are greater than the flow rates obtained from semi-empirical formulas. At the same time, they are in good qualitative agreement, and the quantitative difference averages 25%, which can be regarded as confirmation of the reliability of the nu-merical model. Based on the calculation results, we plotted the proportionality coefficient graphs against the degree of closure of the throttling device. Originality. The work allows determining the degree of influence of the frictio-nal component on the variation of the pressure difference in the pneumatic cylinder and the auxiliary reservoir of the pneumatic suspension system. Also, the work proposes a method to determine the dependence of the working medium on the capacity of the throttling device and its geometric features. Practical value. The ability to predict the operating parameters of the pneumatic system depending on the pneumatic resistance of the throttling device will improve the car running characteristics, increase the comfort of passenger transport, and also reduce the wear of the rolling stock and track gauge due to vehicle-track interaction.

Author Biographies

O. H. Reidemeister, Dnipropetrovsk National University of Railway Transport named after Academician V. Lazaryan

Dep. «Car and Car Facilities», Dnipropetrovsk National University of Railway Transport named after Academician
V. Lazaryan, Lazaryan St., 2, Dnipro, Ukraine, 49010,
tel. +38 (056) 373 15 04,
e-mail reidemeister@mail.ru

A. V. Laguza, Dnipropetrovsk National University of Railway Transport named after Academician V. Lazaryan

Dep. «Car and Car Facilities», Dnipropetrovsk National University of Railway Transport named after Academician
V. Lazaryan, Lazaryan St., 2, Dnipro, Ukraine, 49010,
tel. +38 (056) 373 15 04,
e-mail nastaci@yahoo.com

References

Andreev, A. F., Artemev, P. P., Bartosh, P. R., Bartashevich, L. V., Bogdan, N. V., Korolkevich, A. V., & Metlyuk, N. F.(1998). Gidropnevmoavtomatika i gidroprivod mobilnykh mashin. Sredstva gidropnevmoavtomatiki: Uchebnoe posobie. Minsk: VUZ-YuNITI BGPA-ISN. (in Russian)

Idelchik, I. Y. (1992). Spravochnik po gidravlicheskim soprotivleniyam. Moscow: Mashinostroenie. (in Russian)

Kamaev, V. A. (1980). Optimizatsiya parametrov khodovykh chastey zheleznodorozhnogo podvizhnogosostava. Moscow: Mashinostroenie. (in Russian)

Klapan drosselnyy nerzhaveyushchiy AISI 304(L)/316(L). Retrived from http://www.progressteel.com.ua/armatura/drosselnyjj-klapan/. (in Russian)

Klapany dlya vozdukha, gaza i zhidkostey s pnevmoupravleniem (San Marino). Retrived from http://docplayer.ru/39907306-Klapany-dlya-vozduha-gazov-i-zhidkostey-s-pnevmoupravleniem-san-marino.html. (in Russian)

Biryukov, I. B., Savoskin, A. N., & Burchak G. P. et al. (1992). Mekhanicheskaya chast tyagovogo podvizhnogo sostava: Uchebnik dlya vuzov zheleznodorozhnogo transporta. Moscow: Transport. (in Russian)

Acherkan, N. S. (Ed). (1956). Spravochnik mashinostroitelya. (Vol. 1-6). Moscow: Gosudarstvennoe nauchno-tekhnicheskoe izdatelstvo mashinostroitelnoy literatury. (in Russian)

Chugaev, R. R. (1982). Gidravlika (Tekhnicheskaya mekhanika zhidkosti): Uchebnik dlya vuzov. Leningrad: Energoizdat, Leningradskoe otdelenie. (in Russian)

Abid, H. J., Chen, J., & Nassar, A. A. (2015). Equivalent Air Spring Suspension Model for Quarter-PassiveModel of Passenger Vehicles. International Scholarly Research Notices, 2015, 1-6. doi: 10.1155/2015/974020. (in English)

Ahmed, M. I., Hazlina, M. Y., & Rashid, M. M. (2016). Mathematical Modeling and Control of Active Suspension System for a Quarter Car Railway Vehicle. Malaysian J. of Mathematical Sciences, 10(S), 227-241. Retrived from http://einspem.upm.edu.my/journal/fullpaper/vol10sfeb2/No20.pdf. (in English)

Aizpun, M., Vinolas, J., & Alonso, A. (2014). Using the stationary tests of the acceptance process of a railvehicle to identify the vehicle model parameters. Proc. of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part F:J. of Rail and Rapid Transit, 228(4), 1-14. doi: 10.1177/0954409713478592. (in English)

Hengjia Zhu, James Yang, Yunqing Zhang, & Xingxing Feng (2017). A novel air spring dynamic model withpneumatic thermodynamics, effective friction and viscoelastic damping. Journal of Soundand Vibration, 408,87-104. doi: 10.1016/j.jsv.2017.07.015. (in English)

Shiyu Zhao, Huaxia Deng, Jin Zhang, Liandong Yu, Shuaishuai Sun, Weihua Li, & Laijun Zhou (2013).A novel MR device with variable stiffness and damping capability. Intern. Journal of Aerospace and Light-weight Structures, 3(3), 325-335. doi: 10.3850/S2010428613000032. (in English)

Docquier, N., Fisette, P., & Jeanmart, H. (2008). Model-based evaluation of railway pneumatic suspensions.Vehicle System Dynamics: International Journal of Vehicle Mechanics and Mobility, 46, 481-493.doi: 10.1080/00423110801993110. (in English)

Docquier, N., Fisette, P., & Jeanmart, H. (2008). Model-based evaluation of railway pneumatic suspensions. Vehicle System Dynamics: International Journal of Vehicle Mechanics and Mobility, 46, 481-493. doi: 10.1080/00423110801993110. (in English)

Gialleonardo, E. D., Braghin, F., & Bruni, S. (2012). The influence of track modelling options on the simulation ofrail vehicle dynamics. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 331, 4246-4258. doi: 10.1016/j.jsv.2012.04.024. (in English)

Iwnicki, S. (2006). Handbook of Railway Vehicle Dynamics. Boca Raton: CRC Press. doi: 10.1201/9781420004892. (in English)

Facchinetti, A., Mazzola, L., Alfi, S., & Bruni, S. (2010). Mathematical modelling of the secondary airspring suspension in railway vehicles and its effect on safety and ride comfort. Vehicle System Dynamics: International Journal of Vehicle Mechanics and Mobility, 48(1), 429-449. doi: 10.1080/00423114.2010.486036. (in English)

Mazzola, L., & Berg, M. (2014). Secondary suspension of railway vehicles – air spring modelling: Performance and critical issues. Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit, 228(3), 225-241. doi: 10.1177/0954409712470641. (in English)

Docquier, N., Poncelet, A., Delannoy, M., & Fisette, P. (2007). Multiphysic modelling of railway vehicles equipped with pneumatic suspensions. Vehicle System Dynamics: International Journal of Vehicle Mechanicsand Mobility, 46(6), 505-524. doi: 10.1080/00423110601050848. (in English)

Docquier, N., Poncelet, A., Delannoy, M., & Fisette, P. (2010). Multiphysics modelling of multibody systems:application to car semiactive suspensions. Vehicle System Dynamics: International Journal of Vehicle Mechanics and Mobility, 48(12), 1439-1460. doi: 10.1080/00423110903509335. (in English)

Zhu, H., Yang, J., Zhang, Y., Feng, X., & Ma, Z. (2017). Nonlinear dynamic model of air spring with a damperfor vehicle ride comfort. Nonlinear dynamic, 89(2), 1545-1568. doi: 10.1007/s11071-017-3535-9. (in English)

Raju, K. R., & Varma, D. V. (2017). Vineeth Developments in vibration control of structures and structural components with magnetorheological fluids. Current Science, 112(3), 499-508. doi: 10.18520/cs/v112/i03/499-508. (in English)

Reidemeister, О. H., & Kivisheva, A. V. (2016). Dependence of air spring parameters on throttle resistance. Science and Transport Progress, 2(62), 157-164. doi: 10.15802/stp2016/67339. (in English)

Sayyaadi, H., & Shokouhi, N. (2009). A New model in rail vehicles dynamics considering nonlinear suspension components behavior. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, 55, 222-232. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2009.01.003. (in English)

Wilcox, D. C. (1994). Turbulence modeling for CFD. La Cañada Flintridge, California: DCW Industries, Inc.La Canada. (in English)

Published

2021-03-23

How to Cite

Reidemeister, O. H., & Laguza, A. V. (2021). DETERMINATION OF CHARACTERISTICS OF THROTTLING DEVICE FOR PNEUMATIC SPRING. Science and Transport Progress, (1(73), 66–76. https://doi.org/10.15802/stp2018/123394

Issue

Section

OPERATION AND REPAIR OF TRANSPORT MEANS