ISSN 2307–3489 (Print), ІSSN 2307–6666 (Online)

Наука та прогрес транспорту. Вісник Дніпропетровського
національного університету залізничного транспорту, 2017, № 6 (72)

ТРАНСПОРТНЕ БУДІВНИЦТВО

Introduction

Plastic is a non-biodegradable material increasing exponentially due to tremendous growth in population, urbanization and changed life style with its widespread applications. Researchers found that the material can remain on earth for 4500 years without degradation [1]. Several studies have proven the health hazard caused by improper disposal of plastic waste. In this scenario, the conventional waste disposal methods are found to be inadequate. Researchers and scientist are trying to work on reduction, recycling, reusing and energy recovery from solid wastes. Study revealed that, out of total plastic waste in India, around 94% waste comprises of thermoplastic content, which is recyclable such as PET, LDPE, HDPE, PVC etc. and remaining 6% belongs to the family of thermoset and other categories of plastics such as SMC, FRP, multi-layered, thermocol, etc.

In the current era of economic development with such a hefty population, it is required to have a dense network of road for the smooth transportation of goods & passengers. India, despite having one of the largest railway network moves mostly on roads. Be it passenger or freight all move on roads. Nearly 65% of freight and 85% of passenger traffic use roads for their movement [4]. In India flexible pavements are generally preferred due va-rious advantages such as low cost, availability of material, speed of construction, ease in construction, low maintenance and ease in upgradation. It should be noted that major portion of highway in India is flexible. Recent research suggests that these plastic materials can be used in road construction as a binding material. Polyethylene is extensively used plastic material, and it has been found to be one of the most effective polymer additives in road construction. Use of plastic along with the bitumen in construction of roads not only increases its ductility and smoothness but also makes it economically sound and environment friendly [17]. From an environmental and economic point of view, the use of recycled instead of virgin materials could have several advantages such as help easing landfill pressures and reducing demands of extraction from natural quarries. Furthermore, this would be an alternative solution for environmental pollution by utilizing waste materials as secondary materials in road construction projects [14]. Waste plastic bitumen road is found to be stronger, durable, withstand heavy loads, absorption of radiations, resistive to cracking and rutting. Generally two processes are adopted first is Wet process which is basically the polymer enriched/modified bitumen process and secondly the Dry process that is basically poly coated aggregate process [4].

Literature Review

Amit P. Gawande (2013) had used the plastic waste in the construction of bituminous road construction by replacing conventional type of aggregate with plastic coated aggregate and also mixed in bitumen. The dry process was used for the aggregate while the wet process was used for the bitumen. The dry process helps to have better binding of bitumen with the plastic-waste coated aggregate due to increased bonding and increased area of contact between polymer and bitumen. The polymer coating also reduces the voids. This prevents the moisture absorption and oxidation of bitumen by entrapped air. This technique adds a cumulative benefit to National Economy also gives contribution to environmental benefits, employment generation and agricultural efficiency [1].

Mayura M. Yeole et.al, (2014) have highlighted the developments in using plastics waste to make plastic roads. In the flexible pavement construction where bitumen binders are used, it is of significant importance that the binders form ductile thin films around the aggregates. This serves as a satisfactory binder in improving the physical interlocking of the aggregates. The objective behind the experiment was to measure the ductility of given sample of homogeneous mixture i.e. bitumen and waste plastic and to determine the suitability of mix. The bitumen was prepared using waste plastic for varying percentage by wet process and allowed to test with the help of ductility apparatus. Percentage of waste plastic added in bitumen, the ductility value of modified bitumen is decreases. If the ductility value is less than specified value then road surfaces may get cracked and due to this life of pavement will be reduced, Hence 9% of the plastic waste must be added to the bitumen for the better performance of the roads using wet process [17].

Shirish N. Nemade et.al, (2013) use the polymer waste with or without crumb rubber to modify the properties of bitumen. The wastes like crumb rubber, HDPE waste, LDPE, PP Waste and mixture of crumb rubber- HDPE waste were taken into consideration. When these plastics are added into bitumen, various differentiating results have obtained. The addition of this waste is determined by means of weight % of bitumen. It is called out by two processes, viz, dry and wet process. Dry process is used for aggregate while wet process is used for bitumen. The waste obtained and mixed in different forms i.e. polymer waste was in shredded form and HDPE waste in strand form and crumb rubber was in powder form. From the obtained results they conclude that it not only strengthened the road construction but also increased the road life as well as will help to improve the environment and also creating a source of income [16].

Dhirar Taha Mohammed et.al, (2014) used po-lyethylene terephthalate (PET) as asphalt modifier in asphalt. The research paper has focused on the ability of improving the performance of asphalt mixtures using Polyethylene Terephthalate (PET) obtained from plastic waste in Mosul landfills. Five different percentages of PET are added using wet process. Marshall test, moisture susceptibility and durability test are conducted on unmodified and modified asphalt mixtures. The results showed that the optimum polymer content of PET is 4%. the addition of this percentage of polymer lead to an improvement in the durability, resistance of asphalt mixture to moisture damage & increase of the Marshall stability by 36.09% while the flow values reduced slightly [15].

Dixit Sandhya et.al, (2013) quoted that in the wet process, shredded waste plastic is mixed with hot bitumen at a temperature 1600C with the help of powerful mechanical stirrers. The stabilizers are also added to the bitumen during heating. The mix is then laid on the road. In this process, mixing of higher percentages of is however, difficult because of the difference in viscosities of molten plastic waste and bitumen [5].

Bindu et al. (2010) investigate the benefits of stabilizing the stone mastic asphalt (SMA) mixture in flexible pavement with shredded waste plastic. Conventional (without plastic) and the stabilized SMA mixtures were subjected to performance tests including Marshall Stability, tensile strength and compressive strength tests. Triaxial tests were also conducted with varying percentage bitumen by weight of mineral aggregate (6% to 8%) and by varying percentage plastic by weight of mix (6% to 12% with an increment of 1%). Plastic content of 10% by weight of bitumen is recommended for the improvement of the performance of Stone Mastic Asphalt mixtures [2].

Materials and Methods

Various materials used in the present study are bitumen, aggregate (fine and coarse), filler, and shredded plastic waste. The bitumen used for present study is of 60/70 penetration grade and is obtained from BPCL, Nagpur and PWD, Amravati. Coarse aggregates, fine aggregates and fly ash were collected from local producer of crushed aggregates. The plastic waste was segregated from the municipal waste and shredded at the local plastic waste recycling plant at MIDC, Amravati.

The experiment was conducted into two parts. The first part consists of calculating the optimum value of the bitumen and second part consists of optimizing the quantity of plastic waste used to replace the bitumen. Wet process was used to mo-dify the bitumen and Marshall Samples were prepared using the same bitumen. In this process the coarse aggregates and fine aggregate and fly ash were heated to 170°C. The bitumen was heated to 160⁰C and shredded plastic waste retaining on 2.36 mm sieve is added in proportion by weight to the hot bitumen and mixed thoroughly using mechanical stirrer to obtain homogenous mix. The waste plastic LDPE, PVC and HDPE were added varying from 0%, 2%, 4%, 6%, 8%, 10% and 12% by the weight of bitumen. This modified bitumen was added to the homogenous mix of aggregate, bitumen and plastic waste. After proper mixing the mix was placed in the compaction mould and compacted with 75 blows on both face to get Marshall Samples. The stability and flow were obtained by testing the sample on the digital Marshall frame and the average values for Bulk specific Gravity, AV, VMA and VFB were calculated and graphs were plotted. The values obtained stability values are corrected after applying the correction for thickness of the sample. According to Das, A. and Chakroborty P. the following properties were calculated based on volumetric analysis [3].

Bulk Specific Gravity of sample (Gb)

The bulk density of the sample is determined by weighing the sample (Wa) and by taking its submerged weight (Ww). The specific gravity of the specimen is given by

where, Gb = Bulk Specific Gravity of sample,
Wa = Weight of sample in air (g), Ww = Weight of sample in water (g).

Theoretical specific gravity of the mix (Gt)

Theoretical specific gravity Gt is the specific gravity without considering air voids, and is given by:

where, P1 is the Percentage by weight of 20mm coarse aggregate in the total mix, P2 is the Percentage by weight of 10mm coarse aggregate in the total mix, P3 is the Percentage by weight of Stone Dust in the total mix, Pf is the Percentage by weight of filler in the total mix, Pb is the Percentage by weight of bitumen in the total mix, G1 is the specific gravity of 20mm coarse aggregate, G2 is the specific gravity of 10mm coarse aggregate, G3 is the specific gravity of Stone Dust, Gf is the specific gravity of Filler, Gb is the specific gravity of bitumen

Bulk Specific Gravity of Aggregate (Gsb)

where, P1 is the Percentage by weight of 20mm coarse aggregate in the total mix, P2 is the Percentage by weight of 10mm coarse aggregate in the total mix, P3 is the Percentage by weight of Stone Dust in the total mix, Pf is the Percentage by weight of filler in the total mix, G1 is the specific gravity of 20mm coarse aggregate, G2 is the specific gravity of 10mm coarse aggregate, G3 is the specific gravity of Stone Dust, Gf is the specific gravity of filler.

Air voids percent (AV)

It is the total volume of the small pockets of air between the coated aggregate particles throughout a compacted paving mixture, expressed as a percent of the bulk volume of the compacted paving mixture. The amount of air voids in a mixture is extremely important and closely related to stabi-lity, durability and permeability. The following equation represents the percentage of air voids in the specimen.

Voids in the Mineral Aggregate (VMA)

VMA is the volume of inter granular void space between the aggregate particles of a compacted paving mixture. It includes the air voids and the volume of the asphalt not absorbed into the aggregate .VMA describes the portion of space in a compacted asphalt pavement or specimen which is not occupied by the aggregate. VMA is expressed as a percentage of the total volume of the mix Voids Filled with Binder (VFB).

where, Ps = Aggregate content, %;Gsb = Bulk specific gravity of total aggregat;eGmb = Bulk speci-fic gravity of mixed aggregate.

Voids Filled with Bitumen (VFB)

VFB is the voids in the mineral aggregate frame work filled with bitumen binder. This represents the volume of the effective bitumen content. It can also be described as the percent of the vo-lume of the VMA that is filled with bitumen. VFB is inversely related to air voids and hence as air voids decreases, the VFB increases.

where, AV is air voids in the mix and, VMA is the voids in the mineral aggregate.

Results and Discussion

The optimum binder content for the mix was found to be 6% since the maximum stability was found at 6 % of binder content. The obtained value was further used for the subsequent study. During the experiment PVC type of plastic waste was also used but while mixing the shredded PVC plastic with hot bitumen some gases were coming out of the mix and hence PVC plastic was not used for further experiment. The details of volumetric and mechanical properties are tabulated in the table and figures below.

Table 1

Optimum Bitumen Value Calculation

Bitumen content %	Bulk Specific Gravity Gb (gm/cm3)	Theoretical Specific Gravity Gt (gm/cm3)	Void Analysis			Marshall Stability (kN)		Flow(mm)
						AV (%)	VMA (%)		VFB (%)	Measured	Corrected
5	2.195	2.389	8.131	23.046	64.818	10.52	9.40	2.32
5.5	2.204	2.361	6.673	23.146	71.334	12.14	10.69	2.54
6	2.205	2.334	5.527	23.508	76.605	13.89	11.95	2.64
6.5	2.200	2.307	4.639	24.076	80.897	12.11	10.70	3.22
7	2.198	2.281	3.638	24.552	85.285	11.56	10.05	3.72

Fig. 1. Bitumen Content Vs Stability

Fig. 2. Bitumen Content Vs flow

Fig. 3. Stability Vs V.M.A %

Fig. 4. Bitumen Content Vs Air Void %

Fig. 5. Bitumen Content Vs V.F.B %

The volumetric and mechanic properties of the mix were obtained after adding LDPE and HDPE types of plastic at 2%, 4%, 6%, 8%, 10% and 12% by the weight of bitumen and the results are tabulated in the table and figures below.

Table 2

Plastic Waste Calculation

Type of Plastic	Plastic Waste %	Bulk Specific Gravity Gb (gm/cm3)	Theoretical Specific Gravity Gt (gm/cm3)	Void Analysis			Marshall Stability (kN)		Flow(mm)
								AV (%)		VMA (%)	VFB (%)	Measured	Corrected
	0	2.205	2.334	5.53	23.51	76.61	13.89	11.95	2.64
LDPE	2	2.224	2.334	4.72	22.86	79.34	13.02	13.02	2.46
HDPE	2	2.22	2.334	4.89	22.99	78.75	13.34	12.85	2.49
LDPE	4	2.241	2.334	3.98	22.26	82.12	14.76	13.73	2.52
HDPE	4	2.232	2.334	4.35	22.56	80.70	14.58	14.00	2.56
LDPE	6	2.25	2.334	3.58	21.93	83.69	15.35	14.73	2.65
HDPE	6	2.241	2.334	3.98	22.26	82.11	16.39	14.59	2.71
LDPE	8	2.235	2.334	4.22	22.45	81.21	15.44	13.94	2.78
HDPE	8	2.235	2.334	4.24	22.47	81.21	15.39	14.10	2.88
LDPE	10	2.219	2.334	4.93	23.02	78.60	14.43	13.03	3.27
HDPE	10	2.213	2.334	5.17	23.22	77.74	14.37	13.17	3.34
LDPE	12	2.201	2.334	5.71	23.65	75.88	13.04	11.78	4.37
HDPE	12	2.195	2.334	5.94	23.85	75.10	13.23	11.95	4.10

Fig. 6. % of Bitumen replaced by plastic
waste Vs Stability

Fig. 7. % of Bitumen replaced by plastic waste Vs Flow

Fig. 8. % of Bitumen replaced by plastic
waste Vs Air void %

Fig. 9. % of Bitumen replaced by plastic
waste Vs V.F.B %

Fig. 10. % of Bitumen replaced by plastic
waste Vs V.M.A%

Conclusions

– From the investigation on utility of plastic waste as an additive for bituminous concrete using wet process of mixing it can be concluded that addition of plastic improves the Marshall properties of the mix.

– The Addition of 6% of the LDPE and HDPE plastic waste improves the stability value of the bituminous mix which results is the increase in the toughness of the mix. The roads can withstand heavy traffic and shows better service life.

– Due to addition of plastic waste the flow va-lue increases resulting the improvement in the workability.

– Addition of plastic waste results in decrease in the air voids which reduces the bleeding of bitumen.

– The volumetric and Marshall properties of the mix show the acceptable trends and could sa-tisfy the specified limits.

– This study has a positive impact on environment and the use of waste plastic in bituminous concrete is eco-friendly way of using waste plastic for road construction.

LIST OF REFERENCE LINKS

1. An overview on waste plastic utilization in asphalting of roads / G. Amit, G. Zamare, V. C. Renge, S. Tayde, G. Bharsakale // Journal of Engineering Research and Studies. – 2012. – Vol. 3, No. 2. – P. 1–5.

2. Bindu, C. S. Waste plastic as a stabilizing additive in Stone Mastic Asphalt / C. S. Bindu, K. S. Beena // Intern. Journal of Engineering and Technology. – 2010. – Vol. 2 (6). – P. 379–387.

3. Das, A. Principles of Transportation Engineering / A. Das, P. Chakroborty. – New Delhi : Prentice Hall of India, 2010. – P. 294–299.

4. Devesh, O. A Proposed Design of Flexible Pavement using Waste Plastic / O. Devesh, D. Kumar // Intern. Journal of Engineering and Management Research. – 2014. – Vol. 4. – Iss. 5. – P. 21–26.

5. Dixit, S. Studies on the Improvement of Characteristics of Bitumen with Use of Waste Plastic / S. Dixit,
   D. Rastogi // Intern. Journal of Emerging Technology and Advanced Engineering. – 2013. – Vol. 3. – Iss. 3. – P. 895–900.

6. Guidelines for Co-processing of Plastic Waste in Cement Kilns [Electronic resource]. – Delhi : Central Pollution Control Board, 2017. – Available at: http://www.cpcb.nic.in/wast/plasticwast/Co-processing_Guidelines_Final_23.05.17.pdf. – Title from the screen. – Accessed : 11.12.2017.

7. IS:2386-4. Methods of Test for Aggregates for Concrete. Part IV. Mechanical Properties [Electronic resource] – New Delhi : Bureau of Indian Standards, 1963. – Available at: https://archive.org/details/gov.in.is.2386.4.1963. – Title from the screen. – Accessed : 12.12.2017.

8. IS:2386-1. Methods of Test for Aggregates for Concrete. Part I. Particle Size And Shape [Electronic resource] – New Delhi : Bureau of Indian Standards, 1963. – Available at: https://archive.org/details/gov.in.is.2386.1.1963. – Title from the screen. – Accessed : 12.12.2017.

9. IS:1205-1978. Methods for testing tar and bituminous materials. Determination of Softening point [Electronic resource]. – New Delhi : Bureau of Indian Standards, 2013. – Available at: http://civilblog.org/2013/05/12/softening-point-of-bitumen-is12051978/. – Title from the screen. – Accessed : 11.12.2017.

10. IS:2386-3. Methods of test for aggregates for concrete. Part 3. Specific gravity, density, voids, absorption and bulking [Electronic resource]. – New Delhi : Bureau of Indian Standards, 1963. – Available at:https://archive.org/details/gov.in.is.2386.3.1963. – Title from the screen. – Accessed : 11.12.2017.

11. IS:1208-1978. Indian standard methods for testing tar and bituminous materials (Determination of ductility) [Electronic resource]. – New Delhi : Bureau of Indian Standards, 2013. – Available at: http://civilblog.org/2013/05/12/ductility-value-of-bitumen-is1208-1978/. – Title from the screen. – Accessed : 11.12.2017.

12. IS:1203-1978. Indian standard methods for testing tar and bituminous materials (Determination of penetration) [Electronic resource]. – New Delhi : Bureau of Indian Standards, 2013. – Available at: http://civilblog.org/2013/05/12/penetration-value-of-bitumen-is1203-1978/. – Title from the screen. – Accessed : 11.12.2017.

13. IS:1202-1978. Determination of specific gravity [Electronic resource]. – New Delhi : Bureau of Indian Standards. – Available at: http://164.100.105.199:8071/php/BIS/IndStndrdLocatr/ISDetails.php?ID=MTgxMzA%3D. – Title from the screen. – Accessed : 11.12.2017.

14. Modarres, A. Effect of waste plastic bottles on the stiffness and fatigue properties of modified asphalt mixes / A. Modarres, H. Hamedi // Materials&Design. – 2014. – Vol. 61. – P. 8–15.
    doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2014.04.046.

15. Mohammed, D. T. Evaluation of Pyrolysis PET Utilization in Asphalt Binder / D. T. Mohammed, Z. H. Hussein // Intern. Journal of Enhanced Research in Science Technology & Engineering. – 2014. – Vol. 3. – P. 114–121.

16. Nemade, S. N. Utilization of Polymer Waste for Modification of Bitumen in Road Construction /
    S. N. Nemade, P. V. Thorat // Scientific Reviews and Chemical Communications. – 2013. – Vol. 2. – Iss. 3. – P. 198–213.

17. Yeole, M. M. Eco-Friendly Binder In Flexible Pavement / M. M. Yeole, V. A. Jagtap // Intern. Journal of Research in Engineering & Technology. – 2014. – Vol. 2. – Iss. 6. – P. 45–50.

А. В. ТІВАРІ^1*, І.Р.м. РАО^2*

^1*Каф. «Цивільне будівництво», Інженерний і технологічний коледж,
Сіпна, Амраваті, Махараштра, Індія, 444701,
тел. +91 (827) 539 57 52, ел. пошта anuragearth@gmail.com,
ORCID 0000-0001-5276-9514
^2*Інженерний коледж д-ра Паулса, Віллупурам Діст, Тамілнаду,
Індія, 605109, тел. +91 (978) 65 58 12,
ел. пошта dryrmrao@rediffmail.com, ORCID 0000-0002-5185-0377

ДОСЛІДЖЕННЯ ВИКОРИСТАННЯ ПЛАСТИКОВИХ

ВІДХОДІВ ЯК ДОБАВКИ ДЛЯ БІТУМНОГО БЕТОНУ

ПРИ ЗАСТОСУВАННІ МОКРОГО ПРОЦЕСУ

ЗМІШУВАННЯ

Мета. Пластмасові відходи стали серйозною екологічною проблемою, викликаною їх експоненціальним ростом через швидку урбанізацію. В якості вирішення проблеми використовуються відходи для створення міцної дорожньої поверхні. Для змішування пластикових відходів із бітумом вживаються сухий та вологий процеси. Сухий процес змішування пластикових відходів із бітумною сумішшю є найбільш поширеним, проводиться багато досліджень по його застосуванню. Метою даної роботи є дослідження пластикових відходів у якості добавки для бітумного бетону з використанням мокрого процесу змішування. Методика. Технологія цієї роботи була розроблена в ході комплексного дослідження, яка в тому числі вивчає склад бітумної суміші Marshall. Даний компонент додавався до пластмасових відходів. Модифікація бітуму, отримана при використанні мокрого процесу змішування, випробовувалася на дослідних зразках. Аналіз результатів також представлявся у формі таблиці та малюнків. У цій роботі для переробки бітуму використовуються поліетиленові відходи LDPE і HDPE. Результати. Отримані результати показують, що додавання 6 % бітуму покращує властивості суміші Marshall. Використання пластика для модифікації бітуму не тільки робить дорожню поверхню більш довговічною, але також є екологічно чистим способом правильної утилізації пластикових відходів. Наукова новизна. Розширено уявлення про перевагу використання пластикових відходів у якості компонентів бітумного бетону при застосуванні мокрого процесу змішування. У той же час автори підкреслюють, що в даній роботі мокрий процес змішування ще не вивчений у повному обсязі. Практична значимість. Практичне застосування утилізації пластикових відходів для модифікації бітуму в бітумній суміші підвищує значення стабільності, що призводить до більш міцної дорожньої поверхні. Крім того, метод забезпечує належну утилізацію пластикових відходів екологічно безпечним способом.

Ключові слова: пластикові відходи; повторне використання відходів; дорожнє будівництво; асфальтобетон; мокрий процес

А. В. ТИВАРИ^1*, И.Р.М. РАО^2*

^1*Каф. «Гражданское строительство», Инженерный и технологический колледж,
Сипна, Амравати, Махараштра, Индия, 444701, тел. +91 (827) 539 57 52,
эл. почта anuragearth@gmail.com, ORCID 0000-0001-5276-9514
^2*Инженерный колледж д-ра Паулса, Виллупурам Дист, Тамилнаду, Индия,
605109тел. +91 (978) 65 58 12, эл. почта dryrmrao@rediffmail.com,
ORCID 0000-0002-5185-0377

ИССЛЕДОВАНИЕ ИСПОЛЬЗОВАНИЯ ПЛАСТИКОВЫХ

ОТХОДОВ В КАЧЕСТВЕ ДОБАВКИ ДЛЯ БИТУМНОГО

БЕТОНА ПРИ ПРИМЕНЕНИИ МОКРОГО ПРОЦЕССА

СМЕШИВАНИЯ

Цель. Пластмассовые отходы стали серьезной экологической проблемой, вызванной их экспоненциальным ростом из-за быстрой урбанизации. В качестве решения проблемы используются отходы для создания прочной дорожной поверхности. Для смешивания пластиковых отходов с битумом употребляются сухой и влажный процессы. Сухой процесс смешивания пластиковых отходов с битумной смесью является наиболее распространенным, проводится много исследований по его применению. В данной работе целью является исследование пластиковых отходов в качестве добавки для битумного бетона с использованием мокрого процесса смешивания. Методика. Технология настоящей работы была разработана в ходе комплексного исследования, в том числе изучающего состав битумной смеси Marshall. Данный компонент добавлялся к пластмассовым отходам. Модификация битума, полученная при использовании мокрого процесса смешивания, испытывалась на опытных образцах. Анализ результатов также представлялся в форме таблицы и рисунков. В настоящей работе для переработки битума используются полиэтиленовые отходы LDPE и HDPE. Результаты. Полученные результаты показывают, что добавление 6 % битума улучшает свойства смеси Marshall. Использование пластика для модификации битума не только делает дорожную поверхность более долговечной, но также является экологически чистым способом правильной утилизации пластиковых отходов. Научная новизна. Расширено представление о преимуществе использования пластиковых отходов в качестве компонентов битумного бетона при применении мокрого процесса смешивания. В то же время авторы подчеркивают, что в настоящей работе мокрый процесс смешивания еще не изучен в полном объеме. Практическая значимость. Практическое применение утилизации пластиковых отходов для модификации битума в битумной смеси повышает значения стабильности, что приводит к использованию более прочной дорожной поверхности. Кроме того, метод обеспечивает надлежащую утилизацию пластиковых отходов экологически безопасным способом.

Ключевые слова: пластиковые отходы; повторное использование отходов; дорожное строительство; асфальтобетон; мокрый процесс

REFERENCES

1. Amit, G., Zamare, G., Renge, V. C., Tayde S., & Bharsakale G. (2012). An overview on waste plastic utilization in asphalting of roads. Journal of Engineering Research and Studies, 3(2), 1-5. (in English)

2. Bindu, C. S. & Beena, K. S. (2010). Waste plastic as a stabilizing additive in Stone Mastic Asphalt. International Journal of Engineering and Technology, 2(6), 379-387. (in English)

3. Das, A. & Chakroborty P. (2010). Principles of Transportation Engineering. Prentice Hall of India, New Delhi, 294-299. (in English)

4. Devesh, O. & Kumar, D. (2014). A Proposed Design of Flexible Pavement using Waste Plastic. International Journal of Engineering and Management Research, 4(5), 21-26. (in English)

5. Dixit, S. & Rastogi, D. (2013). Studies on the Improvement of Characteristics of Bitumen with Use of Waste Plastic. International Journal of Emerging Technology and Advanced Engineering, 3(3), 895-900. (in English)

6. Guidelines for Co-processing of Plastic Waste in Cement Kilns (2017). Retrieved from http://www.cpcb.nic.in/wast/plasticwast/Co-processing_Guidelines_Final_23.05.17.pdf. (in English)

7. IS:2386-4. Methods of Test for Aggregates for Concrete. Part IV. Mechanical Properties. Retrieved from https://archive.org/details/gov.in.is.2386.4.1963. (in English)

8. IS:2386-1. Methods of Test for Aggregates for Concrete. Part I. Particle Size And Shape. Retrieved from https://archive.org/details/gov.in.is.2386.1.1963. (in English)

9. IS:1205-1978. Methods for testing tar and bituminous materials-Determination of Softening point. Retrieved from http://civilblog.org/2013/05/12/softening-point-of-bitumen-is12051978/. (in English)

10. IS:2386-3. (1963): Methods of test for aggregates for concrete, Part 3: Specific gravity, density, voids, absorption and bulking [CED 2: Cement and Concrete]. Retrieved from https://archive.org/details/gov.in.is.2386.3.1963. (in English)

11. IS:1208-1978. Indian standard methods for testing tar and bituminous materials (Determination of ductility). Retrieved from http://civilblog.org/2013/05/12/ductility-value-of-bitumen-is1208-1978/. (in English)

12. IS:1203-1978. Indian standard methods for testing tar and bituminous materials (Determination of penetration). Retrieved http://civilblog.org/2013/05/12/penetration-value-of-bitumen-is1203-1978/. (in English)

13. IS:1202-1978. Determination of specific gravity. Retrieved from http://164.100.105.199:8071/php/BIS/IndStndrdLocatr/ISDetails.php?ID=MTgxMzA%3D. (in English)

14. Modarres, A. & Hamedi, H. (2014). Effect of waste plastic bottles on the stiffness and fatigue properties of modified asphalt mixes. Materials&Design, 61, 8-15. doi:10.1016/j.matdes.2014.04.046. (in English)

15. Mohammed, D. T. & Hussein Z. H. (2014). Evaluation of Pyrolisis PET Utilization inAsphalt Binder. Intern. Journal of Enhanced Research in Science Technology & Engineering, 3, 114-121. (in English)

16. Nemade, S. N. & Thorat, P. V. (2013). Utilization of Polymer Waste for Modification of Bitumen in Road Construction. Scientific Reviews and Chemical Communications, 2(3), 198-213. (in English)

17. Yeole, M. M. & Jagtap, V. A. (2014). Eco-Friendly Binder In Flexible Pavement. International Journal of Research in Engineering & Technology, 2(6), P. 45-50. (in English)

Prof. M. I. Netesa, Dr. Sc. (Tech.) (Ukraine) recommended this article to be published

Received: July 31, 2017

Accessed: October 30, 2017

doi 10.15802/stp2017/114319 © Anurag V. Tiwari, Y.R.M. Rao, 2017